Post by account_disabled on Jan 2, 2024 0:28:23 GMT -5
Acriticized legal provisions are not likely to disregard the requirements of constitutional rights regarding equality of rights and free access to justice but on the contrary give expression to the mentioned constitutional rules in that on the one hand they give the parties the opportunity to to effectively know the jurisdictional act and on the other hand it competes through the rigorous regulation of the conditions regarding the reasons for the revision to satisfy the imperative of the stability of the final judicial decisions.
The Peoples Advocate considers that the author of the exception Country Email List of unconstitutionality does not formulate genuine criticisms of unconstitutionality but seeks in reality to modify the legislative solution in the sense that the judgment is communicated not only to the chosen domicile of the litigant but also to his actual domicile. It also shows that the author of the exception of unconstitutionality limited himself to a simple enumeration of some provisions of the Basic Law. From this perspective he appreciates that the exception of unconstitutionality appears to be inadmissible its solution exceeding the competence of the Constitutional Court.
The presidents of the two Chambers of the Parliament did not communicate their views on the exception of unconstitutionality. COURT examining the referral conclusion the views of the Government and the Peoples Advocate the report drawn up by the judgerapporteur the submitted written notes the prosecutors conclusions the criticized legal provisions related to the provisions of the Constitution as well as Law no. notes the following . notified and is competent according to the provisions of art. lit. d from the Constitution as well as from art. paragraph of art. and of Law no. to resolve the exception of unconstitutionality. . The object of the exception of unconstitutionality is represented by the provisions of art. para. and art. para.
The Peoples Advocate considers that the author of the exception Country Email List of unconstitutionality does not formulate genuine criticisms of unconstitutionality but seeks in reality to modify the legislative solution in the sense that the judgment is communicated not only to the chosen domicile of the litigant but also to his actual domicile. It also shows that the author of the exception of unconstitutionality limited himself to a simple enumeration of some provisions of the Basic Law. From this perspective he appreciates that the exception of unconstitutionality appears to be inadmissible its solution exceeding the competence of the Constitutional Court.
The presidents of the two Chambers of the Parliament did not communicate their views on the exception of unconstitutionality. COURT examining the referral conclusion the views of the Government and the Peoples Advocate the report drawn up by the judgerapporteur the submitted written notes the prosecutors conclusions the criticized legal provisions related to the provisions of the Constitution as well as Law no. notes the following . notified and is competent according to the provisions of art. lit. d from the Constitution as well as from art. paragraph of art. and of Law no. to resolve the exception of unconstitutionality. . The object of the exception of unconstitutionality is represented by the provisions of art. para. and art. para.
